Functional Safety in Industrial Manufacturing: Navigating IEC 61508, ISO 13849, IEC 10218 for Safer, Smarter Operations
|
In this blog, we recap our recent eBook, “Functional Safety in Industrial Manufacturing: Navigating IEC 61508, ISO 13849, IEC 10218 for Safer, Smarter Operations.”
Functional Safety in Industrial Manufacturing: Navigating IEC 61508, ISO 13849, IEC 10218 for Safer, Smarter Operations
In the dynamic world of industrial manufacturing, the stakes have never been higher. As factories grow smarter and more interconnected, ensuring the safety of workers, equipment, and processes is paramount. Functional safety, a concept grounded in preventing and mitigating risks through system design and operational safeguards, has become a cornerstone of modern industrial practices.
This eBook serves as your comprehensive guide to navigating the complex but essential landscape of functional safety standards. From the foundational principles of IEC 61508 to the robotic-focused provisions of ISO 10218, we will delve into the key frameworks that underpin safer, smarter operations.
Whether you’re an engineer, safety professional, or business leader, understanding these standards is not just about compliance — it’s about future-proofing your operations in an era of rapid technological advancement. Let’s explore how to harness the power of functional safety for a more resilient and innovative manufacturing environment.
RELATED: Compliance Made Easy with Jama Connect® for Automotive and Semiconductor Development
Understanding Functional Safety
What is Functional Safety? Functional safety ensures that industrial systems operate safely even when they fail. It encompasses risk assessment, hazard mitigation, and the implementation of controls that reduce risks to acceptable levels. Unlike general safety measures, functional safety directly addresses equipment malfunctions and system failures.
Why is Functional Safety Critical?
- Protecting Lives and Assets: Reduces the likelihood of accidents, injuries, and damage.
- Ensuring Compliance: Meets legal and regulatory requirements for industrial operations.
- Boosting Operational Efficiency: Reduces downtime by preventing catastrophic failures
Real-World Examples
The importance of functional safety becomes evident through real-world scenarios where its absence or presence has significantly impacted outcomes. Below are several real-life examples that have been generalized for educational purposes:
- Chemical Processing Plant: A chemical manufacturer experienced a significant incident due to the failure of a pressure control system. The lack of redundancy and inadequate safety measures led to a dangerous overpressure scenario, causing equipment damage and a toxic gas release. This incident underscored the need for comprehensive risk assessments and safety instrumented systems (SIS) compliant with functional safety standards.
- Improvement Through Functional Safety: Another plant, learning from such failures, implemented an SIS aligned with IEC 61508 standards. By incorporating redundancy in pressure sensors and automated shut-off valves, they successfully mitigated similar risks, resulting in zero incidents over a five-year period.
- Automotive Industry: A global automotive manufacturer faced challenges in ensuring brake system reliability. Initial designs lacked sufficient fault-tolerant measures, which could have led to brake failure under specific conditions. Applying functional safety principles, the company developed a braking system that met SIL 3 requirements, enhancing reliability and customer trust.
- Food Processing Machinery: A food processing company faced frequent machine shutdowns due to sensor malfunctions. This not only disrupted production but also posed safety risks to operators. By redesigning their systems to comply with ISO 13849 and implementing real-time diagnostics, the company reduced unplanned downtime by 40% and improved operator safety.
- Renewable Energy Sector: A wind turbine operator encountered significant downtime due to control system errors. By adopting functional safety standards, they redesigned their turbine control systems to include failsafe mechanisms and predictive maintenance features, minimizing operational disruptions and ensuring safer energy production.
These examples illustrate how functional safety principles, when applied effectively, can prevent accidents, enhance reliability, and improve operational efficiency across diverse industries.
RELATED: Traceable Agile™ – Speed AND Quality Are Possible for Software Factories in Safety-critical Industries
IEC 61508 – The Foundation for Functional Safety
Overview of IEC 61508
IEC 61508 is the umbrella standard for functional safety, applicable across industries. It provides comprehensive guidelines for designing, implementing, and maintaining safety-related systems. This standard is particularly valuable for manufacturers dealing with complex systems that demand a high level of safety integrity.
Key Concepts
- Safety Integrity Levels (SIL): These levels define the required risk reduction for safety functions, guiding system designers in their choice of components and processes.
- System Lifecycle Approach: A holistic framework that considers safety at every stage, from concept to decommissioning.
- Risk Reduction: This involves combining advanced technology, rigorous processes, and human expertise to address potential hazards.
Practical Application
Manufacturers can integrate IEC 61508 to design fail-safe systems that detect, prevent, or mitigate failures before they escalate. For instance, in process industries like oil and gas, SIL assessments ensure that critical safety functions meet stringent reliability requirements.
IEC 61508 provides a structured approach for designing safety-related systems, ensuring they meet rigorous reliability and risk-reduction criteria. In industries like oil and gas, this standard is applied to Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS) that monitor and control critical processes. For instance, pressure sensors integrated into pipelines detect potential overpressure conditions. When thresholds are breached, the SIS activates emergency shutdown valves to isolate affected sections, preventing catastrophic equipment failures or environmental hazards. The standard’s lifecycle model ensures these systems are developed, tested, and maintained systematically, reducing the likelihood of failures during operation.
Another practical application is in renewable energy, where wind turbine control systems must operate reliably under varying conditions. By adhering to IEC 61508, manufacturers can incorporate fault-tolerant designs, such as redundant control modules and predictive maintenance algorithms. These enhancements ensure that turbines continue to function safely even when a component fails, maximizing energy production and operator safety. The standard’s emphasis on traceability and verification provides confidence that safety requirements are met throughout the system’s lifecycle, making it a cornerstone for functional safety across diverse industrial settings.
Real-World Applications
One notable example of IEC 61508 implementation is in the chemical processing industry, where automated safety instrumented systems (SIS) are crucial. These systems monitor critical parameters, such as pressure and temperature, and activate protective actions when thresholds are exceeded. For example, a major oil refinery implemented an SIS compliant with SIL 3 to prevent catastrophic equipment failure. The system included redundant pressure sensors and automated valve shutdown mechanisms, effectively reducing the risk of explosion.
Similarly, the automotive industry leverages IEC 61508 for the development of electronic control units (ECUs). A global automotive manufacturer used the standard to design braking systems that maintain performance even during sensor or actuator failures. By adhering to the lifecycle approach outlined in IEC 61508, the company ensured high reliability while minimizing development costs through early risk identification.
These cases highlight the adaptability of IEC 61508 across various sectors, demonstrating its value in achieving both safety and operational excellence.
RELATED: Navigating AI Safety with ISO 8800: Requirements Management Best Practices
ISO 13849 – Safety of Machinery
Purpose of ISO 13849
This standard focuses on the functional safety of machinery, specifically the design and validation of safety-related parts of control systems (SRP/CS). It is essential for environments where machinery interacts closely with operators, ensuring that even complex systems remain safe.
Performance Levels (PL) vs. SIL
While Safety Integrity Levels (SIL) measure risk reduction across systems, Performance Levels (PL) evaluate the probability of dangerous failures in machinery control systems. ISO 13849’s PL framework is particularly relevant for addressing mechanical hazards in automated production lines.
Ensuring Compliance To comply with ISO 13849, manufacturers must:
- Identify potential hazards in machinery.
- Design control systems with adequate fault tolerance.
- Conduct thorough validation and testing.
In industries like automotive or food processing, where machinery operates at high speeds, ISO 13849 provides the tools to ensure both productivity and operator safety.
IEC 62061 – Functional Safety for Machinery Systems
Overview IEC 62061 builds on IEC 61508 and ISO 13849, offering a structured approach to machinery system safety. It provides a detailed methodology for assessing risks, setting safety requirements, and validating safety-related systems.
Integrating Safety
By adopting IEC 62061, manufacturers can:
- Transition seamlessly between PL metrics and SIL frameworks, ensuring consistency across systems.
- Develop comprehensive safety lifecycle plans that align with operational goals.
- Optimize machinery designs for reliability and compliance.
Key Benefits
IEC 62061 emphasizes adaptability, allowing manufacturers to apply its principles to diverse machinery systems. For example, in semiconductor manufacturing, it ensures that high-precision equipment operates reliably under strict safety protocols.
THIS HAS BEEN A PREVIEW – TO READ THIS EBOOK IN ITS ENTIRETY, VISIT:
Functional Safety in Industrial Manufacturing:
Navigating IEC 61508, ISO 13849, IEC 10218 for Safer, Smarter Operations
Director of Product and Solution Marketing at Jama Software
Mario Maldari is a requirements management veteran with over 20 years in the software development lifecycle industry.He has worked across all aspects of the software delivery process, with a particular focus on requirements management best practices and consulting. He currently works for Jama Software as the Director of Product and Solution Marketing.
Latest posts by Mario Maldari (see all)
- Community Event Week 2025: Exclusive Roundtables for Jama Connect® Users - April 28, 2025
- Jama Software Provides a Single, All-in-One Solution for Requirements, Risk Management, and Validation - April 25, 2025
- Jama Connect® Maintains Its Position as the Top Leader in Requirements Management Software - April 17, 2025